- From: Silas S. Brown <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:20:07 +0000 (GMT)
- To: dd@w3.org
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org, ping@lfw.org
Hi, On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > if the proper new warning code is used, why would they do something ? Won't they? I didn't want caches to know about this - wasn't the warning meant for caches? Sorry, I'm getting muddled.... > I don't know, probably before HTTP1.1 stabilized and new work on > extension started. Maybe it was just De Facto - one search engine did it and the others followed (I'm guessing). Regards -- Silas S Brown, St John's College Cambridge UK http://ban.joh.cam.ac.uk/~ssb22 "Let us not become egotistical, stirring up competition with one another, envying one another" - Galatians 5:26
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 1999 08:20:13 UTC