- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 10:53:42 +0100
- To: "Silas S. Brown" <ssb22@cam.ac.uk>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org, ping@lfw.org
> On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > > Let me see if I get this clearly: you expect HTTP1.0 agents to > > implement your extension before they implement a piece of 1.1 ? > > Not really. The access gateway puts the stuff in META tags, and looks for > it in META tags. That way, it doesn't matter what the server is. (Have a > look at the HTML source of any page returned by the gateway to see what I > mean) I know you're using HTTP-EQUIV but that's just a "replacement" for a real HTTP header, isn't it ? In any case, why would using Warning instead of X-Mediator-Warning in the context of HTTP-EQUIV give you different result wrt HTTP support ?
Received on Tuesday, 9 March 1999 04:53:49 UTC