- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 19:42:02 +0200
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
- cc: dd@w3.org, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
[only following up on ER] Thanks for the review Len. > - insert http:// if absent... or just prepopulate the form with http:// I don't like text field with http:// added by default, as I (as a user on the web) have to remove it all the time when I do a copy/paste from my browser (which already has it) but yes I could add http:// if not present. > - lynx 2.8 missing from browser list yes, the list needs rework, it is still the original from the early draft, I also want to add more subjective rating entries (for physical and cognitive) > - not clear what to do to enter "other browser" since first checkbox winds > up labeled "irrelevant". I could change "Irrevelant" to "Pick one" for a better UI ? As soon as you enter text in the "Other Browser" text field, it overrides the menu choice. > - on second page "has been found to have to one or more accessibily problems." > typo (accessibily) oops > - need room for comments (the spot for "other" doesn't seem appropriate" one of the original idea behind the form was not to make it a free form letter going thru w3c to the webmaster (liability issue: people being rude, etc) that explains this limit to a short comment (not a solution to this issue I know) other idea ? we could make 2 lines and see if we have problem when it's being used ? we could label it "Personal comments" in the email sent. > - list of possible problems is rather long. Would help to group the items I'm not sure. what do others think ? > - In a screen reader the (?) links will not be heard if punctuation is > turned off. Change to some word, e.g. "help". Or, better yet, use image > of ? with alt text. Hmmm. Should it be "help for X" (where X = alt text, > color, etc) to make link comprehensible when read alone or just "help" to > avoid redundancy. image + alt looks good, or just help > out of left field: > > - this page constructs horizontal separator bars by coloring a table cell. > This separator is needed to help user perceive grouping. Not clear where > to put this problem. It isn't really "poor color scheme". Actually, this > isn't in the guidelines as far as I can see either; e.g. it isn't really > "don't rely on color alone" either. Will need to contact GL. Well, > there's always "other". yes, I don't pretend to cover all the checkpoints. this is just an initial list, as we go, we'll revise the list to include more of what the "others" come to be > At 11:51 AM 7/10/99 +0200, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > > > >You can start playing with the WAI Report Form at > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/report > > > >You can view reports that other have filled at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-report > > > > > >I suggest we have a beta test period of the system where people use dummy > >or empty webmaster email (that do not go anywhere), until we declare > >it stable. > > > >Send your comments on the form to the w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org list
Received on Wednesday, 21 July 1999 13:42:10 UTC