Re: Issues and Teleconference

> Concerning textual equivalents:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/text-equiv.htm
> 
> Two more attributes that may used for creating
> textual equivalents are ID and CLASS.

ID ok, but class seems far fetched.

> In regard to the NAME attribute, it is not defined 
> for IMG in HTML4.0 (or any other W3C/IETF spec.)

yes, my mistake, AREA too is missing it, I guess because they have
ALT. 

> It is used though to address the IMG element by client side
> scripts in older browsers who do not recognize ID.

that raises the question of whether this technique document should be
limited to what's standard or what's useful

Received on Tuesday, 6 October 1998 09:52:13 UTC