- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1998 15:52:04 +0200
- To: nir.dagan@econ.upf.es (Nir Dagan)
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> Concerning textual equivalents: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/text-equiv.htm > > Two more attributes that may used for creating > textual equivalents are ID and CLASS. ID ok, but class seems far fetched. > In regard to the NAME attribute, it is not defined > for IMG in HTML4.0 (or any other W3C/IETF spec.) yes, my mistake, AREA too is missing it, I guess because they have ALT. > It is used though to address the IMG element by client side > scripts in older browsers who do not recognize ID. that raises the question of whether this technique document should be limited to what's standard or what's useful
Received on Tuesday, 6 October 1998 09:52:13 UTC