- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 14:58:36 +0100
- To: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> Daniel's report form at > <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/report>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/report > > Sheet 2, the report about a URL cannot be put on that URL itself. I think I understand the confusion. [http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/rep2 is an optional step that lists relevant URLs already entered in the system so that the reporter can decide whether or not a new one is needed.] Although they looked like they do, the "existing report" links do not point to the URL itself but to a report area, still to be defined, likely to be an mailing list archive, ala: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-report/OctNov98/0017.html I made some changes in the wording to make it clearer. > The alternative is to provide a standard place that all the reviews > can be put. Yes, I could add a pointer to the archive on this step. > How do we find the webmaster to send the report notifications. I changed step3 so that the tool tries to guess it and presents it to the user in an edit field. > Each report needs to identify the date or version of the URL, in case > it is updated. Doesn't the date of the report (email archived) suffice ? > The fixer should have the ability to return a message indicating > the attempts made to fix the URL. Just replying the report email should do it: From: w3c-wai-report@w3.org To: webmaster@offender.com cc: reporter@foo.com, w3c-wai-report@w3.org Subject: WAI Report - www.offender.com/page ------- and replies give From: webmaster@offender.com To: w3c-wai-report@w3.org cc: reporter@foo.com Subject: Re: WAI Report - www.offender.com/page ------- which goes to the list archive/forum of discussion.
Received on Thursday, 5 November 1998 08:58:51 UTC