- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 07:55:07 -0400
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: public-personalization-tf@w3.org, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, "w3t-wai@w3.org" <w3t-wai@w3.org>
Dear All: After sitting with this proposal for a few days I find myself wanting to play devil's advocate. My concern is that the word is a present tense imperative verb. Is that really the stance we want to take? ARIA is a noun. I wish we could have a noun rather than an imperative verb. I'm not sure that the demand inherent in an imperative is the attitude we want to take? I would further note that in the U.S. disability advocacy context, ADAPT is a fairly millitant organization working for accessible transportation. They've made mainstream news with their tactics: https://adapt.org At the very least I think we should consider these points before moving forward--not that I'm desiring to be the wet blanket here. Best, Janina Shawn Henry writes: > Dear Personalization Task Force, > > After much collaboration, EOWG has a proposal for "branding" formerly-known-as personalization. It is simply... > Adapt > > A rough example of how "Adapt" could be used is in this draft preview: > https://deploy-preview-8--wai-personalization-standards.netlify.app/personalization/ > > (Of course, it might not work -- EOWG doesn't know all the ins-and-outs.) > > Many other ideas and considerations are in the minutes and comments of this GitHub Issue: > https://github.com/w3c/wai-personalization-standards/issues/7 > > Let us know what you think... > > Regards, > ~Your Helpful EO Folks > > -- > <http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/> -- Janina Sajka (she/her/hers) https://linkedin.com/in/jsajka Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Co-Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures http://www.w3.org/wai/apa
Received on Monday, 14 March 2022 11:56:23 UTC