- From: Anna Belle Leiserson <ableiserson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:42:30 -0600
- To: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
- Cc: Jonathan <jonathanmetz@gmail.com>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKBLC5AFR7vBkCvqU9z54jrEKZ-=j0+sBfd+0UCcJBVb9-2jkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, Eric! Tricky JS. I must not have been using Firebug when looking at the code. :-) Anna Belle On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org> wrote: > > Hi Jonathan & AnnaBelle, > > we always use rel="nofollow" in W3C resources as far as I know and we also > do it in the eval tools list: > > - https://github.com/w3c/wai-eval-tools/blob/gh-pages/index.html#L122 > - https://github.com/w3c/wai-eval-tools/blob/gh-pages/index.html#L128 > > The list is also created using JavaScript, so I guess there is little > “oomph” to get :-) > > Eric > > On 12 Dec 2014, at 18:21, Jonathan wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm not sure I agree with that, but actually for the same reason. That > hefty SEO "oomf" might help to increase visibility of accessibility > resources, and in turn help to market the importance of accessibility in > general. > > Best, > Jonathan > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Anna Belle Leiserson ableiserson@gmail.com > Date:12/12/2014 12:00 PM (GMT-05:00) > To: "EOWG (E-mail)" w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > Cc: > Subject: Re: EOWG Reminder: Eval Tools List final review this week > > I only thought of this in the last few days, so because of the > last-minuteness of this I do not consider it a show-stopper or urgent. But > it is important IMO. I do apologize for not thinking of this sooner. > > What I'm wondering is, might it be good to add rel="nofollow" in the links > to the products? I worry about people wanting to be listed on this page for > the sole reason that it gives them the hefty SEO oomph of w3.org. > > Anna Belle > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Shawn Henry shawn@w3.org wrote: > Hi EOWG, > > As discussed in the 5 December teleconference [1] and listed in the Work > for this Week [2], we're nearly ready to announce that the Evaluation Tools > List (user interface) is done and ask for updated tools listings. > > Please make sure you are comfortable with the final version at: > https://w3c.github.io/wai-eval-tools/ > > A list of changes since the November survey [3] is here: > https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Evaluation_tools/Comments > > The updated Submission form is at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/submission.php > > If you have any concerns, please raise them by Tuesday 16 December, as we > hope to announce it on Wednesday. > The link to the Github issues is: > https://github.com/w3c/wai-eval-tools/issues > > Thanks! > ~Shawn & Sharron > > [1] minutes http://www.w3.org/2014/12/05-eo-minutes#item01 > "this is the last call for EO comment. Review the changes, make sure that > you approve the changes and speak now if you have issues with any of the > changes" > [2] work this week > https://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/EOWG_Meetings#Work_for_this_week > [3] Nov survey results > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/tools-list-2014-11/results > > -- > http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/ > > *Note*: I check e-mail on Wednesdays and Thursdays. > If you need a reply before then, please call +1-617-395-7664 > > -- > > Eric Eggert > Web Accessibility Specialist > Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at Wold Wide Web Consortium (W3C) >
Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 22:42:58 UTC