W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > October to December 2013

RE: [action all] Easy Checks - What to call this section?

From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 14:30:18 +0100
To: "'Alan Chuter'" <achuter1@gmail.com>, "'EOWG \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0bde01cee9e2$7caebc30$760c3490$@sidar.org>
I love the last "crazy" idea of Alan. And I think that a little of humor will captivate readers.

All the best,

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
Patrono y Directora General
Fundación Sidar - Acceso Universal
Email: coordina@sidar.org
Personal: Emmanuelle@sidar.org
Web: http://sidar.org


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Alan Chuter [mailto:achuter1@gmail.com] 
Enviado el: lunes, 25 de noviembre de 2013 13:41
Para: EOWG (E-mail)
Asunto: Re: [action all] Easy Checks - What to call this section?

Hi all,

It seems to me that this check is actually three, and the problem for the title is that they conflict. The no-CSS and single column views
**rely** on structure, while the linearised tables view **ignores** it. So any title that tries to be too technically inclusive will stumble on the contradiction.

I find the title "Unstyled Linear View" confuising. It suggests that there is only one view, when there are actually three quite different views.

I can't edit the wiki, but I had a one person brainstorm and came up with

changing faces,
only markup v. no markup,
taking another look,
taking a different look at,
different ways of looking at....,
The Emperor's New Clothes.

I'm not seriously suggesting the last idea, but a search for it using that well-known search engine's images option brings up a host of cartoon images which convey Emmanuelle's suggestion in a very clear and humorous way.

cheers,

Alan

On 22 November 2013 20:16, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:
> EOWG,
>
> In today's call we decided to think about calling the 
> section-formerly-known-as "Plain Content View":
>         Unstyled Linear View
>
> Please skim the previous brainstorms and comments at:
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Easy_Checks#.5BEOWG_open.5DWhat_to_call
> _this_section.3F> and read the minutes from today's discussion at:
> <http://www.w3.org/2013/11/22-eo-minutes#item03>
> (thanks Sharron for cleaning up the minutes so quickly! ;-)
>
> To see it in context with the other section headings and the text 
> describing it, see: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/checks>
>
> Then add your comments on this and your other brainstorms to:
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/Easy_Checks#.5BEOWG_open.5DWhat_to_call
> _this_section.3F>
>
> Thanks!
>
> ~Shawn
>



--
Alan Chuter
achuter1@gmail.com
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 13:30:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:48 UTC