- From: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 16:02:49 -0400
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
The new techniques document is deeply flawed, and reduces access for people with disabilities. My primary trouble is what I consider to be an industry orientation of WCAG WG. Slowly but surely, the WCAG WG is taking back necessary accessibility needs. Their lack of support of 200% enlargement with effective word wrapping is just one of many. Let me be clear, I know that zoom will not enable word wrapping. However, when browsers enable text-only enlargement of text, WCAG WG does not consider lack of support for word wrapping to be a failure. What is that? Word wrapping is necessary for effective reading. If the browser supports word wrapping the content should as well. The stance that accessibility need not be supported by techniques will seriously harm people with disabilities. The problem is that vendors lie about accessibility when they sell software to large institutions. The only protection for school districts, universities and other large entities is reliance on formally written guidelines with up-to-date implementation techniques. I would advise any institution to never buy any product that does not meet current WCAG Techniques. If a vendor comes up with a new technique they should get it to WCAG WG right away. I will work very hard at warning my own CSU System from taking this advice. Finally there is G140: Separating information and structure from presentation to enable different presentations. WCAG WG has narrowed the concept of separating content beneath the needs of most people with print disabilities. Actually WCAG WG narrowed this level of accessibility just enough to make it possible for PDF to pass WCAG. The "Example 2: Tagged PDF" on tagged PDF is an embarrassment for W3C. If WAI really goes forward with this version of Techniques it will cost the organization all its hopes for Standards Harmonization. Governments will have to make their own techniques to protect their people with disabilities. Sincerely, Wayne
Received on Sunday, 4 August 2013 20:03:18 UTC