- From: Michael Lenz (mlenz) <mlenz@cisco.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:18:25 +0000
- To: "<WayneEDick@gmail.com>" <WayneEDick@gmail.com>
- CC: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 15 March 2013 13:56:32 UTC
Having clear and simple language that coveys the intent and purpose is important. While technically accurate to the layman that is a nuance that is lost. It also would mean that search engines would not guide people to our resources given the lack of queries for Luminosity Contrast. [http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/tomorrow_anthem_H.png] Michael Lenz Director, Experience Design Marketing / CMO mlenz@cisco.com<mailto:mlenz@cisco.com> Phone: +1 408 853 6802 Lake Oswego, Oregon United States Cisco.com<http://www.cisco.com> On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:02 PM, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com<mailto:wayneedick@gmail.com>> wrote: I love the Easy Check with one exception. Using, "Color Contrast" is just wrong. We can let it go. We cannot title a section by continuing an incorrect misnomer. We should just title it "Luminosity Contrast". Out with the old, in with the new. Color Contrast is 1.0 Luminosity Contrast is 2.0. I really wish I could be there tomorrow. Have fun. Wayne
Received on Friday, 15 March 2013 13:56:32 UTC