W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2013

WCAG-EM comments - Follow up to our discussion this morning about report formats

From: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:55:39 -0400
Message-id: <86F7DDA7-3A1C-4CCD-BB31-C5A438260EC0@accessibiliteweb.com>
To: "w3c-wai-eo@w3.org (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi everyone,

Considering we were having a hard time analyzing the different kind of report format proposed in WCAG-EM, I thought I'd come up with this little document that highlights what the methodology says.

It's not much, but it's actually helped me make sense of the differences. I aligned the wordings form section 1b and 5a, and kept only the really important information from 5b to make it clearer. 

Basically, my understanding is that the first two report format are asking for the same kind of information, but one globally for the website, the other one, more granularly, for each selected page from the website. The third report goes deeper than the second, by providing recommendation for remediation for each issue found, as well as an appreciation of the issue impact level.

I'm hoping it can also help others who may have been struggling with this a little.


Received on Friday, 5 April 2013 17:56:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:47 UTC