- From: Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 00:45:26 -0500
- To: wed@csulb.edu
- Cc: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Wayne, Maybe I'm missing something here. If I do, please help me understand. Even though I'm not in any position to really argue with you as I am not a screen magnifier user myself (though I seldom test with them for accessibility purposes), I disagree with you when you're saying they're nothing more than a pair of 6x glasses. While using software like ZoomText in 5x mode for example, you actually get only 1/25th of the page presented to you. You are therefore missing a lot of information that is presented outside the viewport. It can hardly be considered the same as wearing a really strong pair of glasses as you're still seeing the whole interface, not simply 1/25th of it (or in the case of said glasses, 1/36th if transposed to the same technology baseline). >From my understanding, while you are wearing a pair of 6x glasses, you will be focusing on a specific parts of the content (like most people do), but you're still getting the global picture of the web page. Screen magnifying software does not allow that. To me, it's a very different thing and therefore leads me to believe that the context in which screen magnifying software is used actually makes it an assistive technology just like screen readers - though serving different needs obviously. and that'S especially true when the tool is used in conjunction with a screen reader. So, Am I missing something? :) Best, /Denis On 2012-01-24, at 12:52 PM, Wayne Dick wrote: > Hi Again, > I forgot one point. Web accessibility and and screen magnification > are disjoing technologies. > > I think we should stop using screen magnifiers as an example of > assistive technology that require accessibility. Actually screen > readers do not provide accessibility support, they provide > inaccessibility enabling. > > WAI literature is filled with the notion that screen magnifiers have > something to do with accessibility. They don't. Screen magnifiers > are no different than good strong pair of reading glasses, like my 6x > pair. You can read with them, but it difficult and uncomfortable. > Magnification is better than nothing, but it's not even OK. The book > you read with prescription reading glasses is still inaccessible > media. > > We are EO on a new project. We don't need to attack magnification as > a tool, but we don't need to promote it. > > Wayne >
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 05:45:54 UTC