- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:30:34 +0200
- To: Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>, EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Wayne, All, Ref: <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/25-eo-minutes.html#action08> In response to an action item from last weeks' EOWG teleconference call, Shawn and I have been looking at the suggestion to define an employment situation for Ms. Martinez scenario. Of the 8 stories, 4 have clear employment, 2 are non-adults, and 2 are unspecified, as listed below. In order to not emphasis employment, I prefer not to add employment to Ms. Martinez. Employment clear: * Mr. Jones, Reporter with repetitive stress injury – employment in title & first paragraph * Ms. Laitinen, Accountant with blindness – employment in title & first paragraph * Mr. Sands, Supermarket assistant with Down syndrome – employment in title & first paragraph * Mr. Yunus, Retiree with low vision, hand tremor, and mild short-term memory loss – "retiree" (in title & first paragraph) implies previous employment Employment not relevant: * Ms. Olsen, Classroom student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and dyslexia – child so employment not appropriate * Ms. Kaseem, Teenager with deaf-blindness – teenager so employment less relevant Employment not stated: * Mr. Lee, Online shopper with color blindness – employment not mentioned * Ms. Martinez, Online student who is hard of hearing – employment not mentioned Please let me know if you have other opinions on this. Best, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 08:31:06 UTC