WCAG 2.0 at a glance: "Robust" and general thoughts

From: Alan Chuter <achuter1@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:11:01 +0200 Message-ID: <BANLkTi=i0kOGL-VpYDmFMb+rqU8SgHV=fg@mail.gmail.com> To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:45 UTC

I've been looking at the proposal of March 3rd [1]. For point 4.1
("Maximize compatibility with..."), and looking at previous versions,
I think maybe changing "Maximize compatibility with" to "Design for"
is much shorter and (I think) is easier to understand. This would
leave room for a more detailed definition of user tools, like "Design
for all browsers and assistive technologies" (51 characters).

best regards,

Alan

[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/flyer/WCAG2glance2011mar

-- 
Alan Chuter
achuter1@gmail.com