- From: Karl Groves <karl.groves@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:06:55 -0400
- To: "'Sharron Rush'" <srush@knowbility.org>, "'EOWG'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Thanks for the reply, Sharron. I'm glad to hear from you. > While there are admittedly other aspects of the > overall redesign, accessibility is definitely not > as trivial as the coat of paint you compare it > to. The point is this: As accessibility is > integrated into the development process, it has a > profound affect on how design decisions are made. > The improved results are so closely interrelated > that - well, you can not separate them, which is > what I think you said. Would the outcomes have > been as great if the deliberate inclusion of > accessibility features NOT been made? We don't > know. Improved outcomes have been demonstrated > in other cases, but we have permission from Legal > and General which, I believe is why we rely on that one situation > so heavily. I kept the above paragraph because I didn't want to seem to be taking things too out of context. You say: " Would the outcomes have been as great if the deliberate inclusion of accessibility features NOT been made? We don't know." I think this sort of makes my point: we don’t know whether L&G's amazing results were specifically due to accessibility improvements. In a presentation aimed at making that argument, any case studies included should be *just* about accessibility. I feel that a more compelling business case would be one in which a list of accessibility problems were found, they were repaired, and they were shown to have a specific and directly attributable benefit. Unfortunately finding such a business case will be quite difficult. As you note, accessibility often is not (and should not be) its own separate effort. All teams involved in design & development need to integrate accessibility into the entire process in order to get a more accessible end product and so when it is done right it is more of a quality of work issue. Nevertheless I still feel that such "business case" would be as closely tied as possible to accessibility only. As you note in the remainder of your response, getting a client to consent to using them as a business case is a challenge. I've been trying to get some business case-type data from some for a long time as well and it is difficult. Thanks. Karl L. Groves Director, Training Deque Systems, Inc. Phone: 443.517.9280 E-mail: karl.groves@deque.com Is a non-compliant website putting your organization at risk? Visit www.deque.com
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 23:07:28 UTC