W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Training Examples - format for outlines

From: Yeliz Yesilada <yesilady@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:04:13 +0200
Message-Id: <E51CE1C5-AF27-4698-A679-7621D748ABE1@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, WAI-AGE Taskforce <public-wai-age@w3.org>
Hi All,

I quite like format 4 and 2. I agree with others that it is much  
easier to scan format 4.

In format 1, I think the reader is not guided and supported at all.  
It's really hard to scan that list. The reader has to read all the  
information provided.

In format 2, it's nicely laid out and it's easy to see and read the  
times.

In format 3, I think using header (H4) is much better than using a  
definition list.

In format 4, is "Questions and discussion" missing in the first column?

Compared to format 4, it is more difficult to scan format 5 and 6. It  
seems like format 5 and 6 focus on presenting the times, but not the  
topics as it is in format 4.

Regards,
Yeliz.
On 2 Mar 2010, at 15:13, Michael Stenitzer wrote:

> dear andrew, dear list(s),
>
> i vote for format 2. i don't see the need for a tabular structure  
> in this case.
>
> regards, michael
>
> Am 02.03.2010 13:29, schrieb Darren Lunn:
>> Andrew,
>>
>> My preference would be for Format 2 - separated under learnings as
>> H4s.  It highlights what each topic within the talk is about and then
>> gives some short bullets.  This makes it easy to scan when you're
>> developing the presentation material.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Darren
>>
>> ========================================= University of Manchester
>> (UK) Human Centred Web Lab http://hcw.cs.manchester.ac.uk/
>>
>> email:  darren.lunn@cs.manchester.ac.uk tel:  +44 (0)161 275 6239
>> url:  http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/~lunnd/
>>
>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 10:28, Andrew Arch wrote:
>>
>>> Dear EOWG and WAI-AGE TF,
>>>
>>> A number of different formats for the training and presentation
>>> examples outlines have been prepared: * Format 1 - ordered list
>>> with timing in brackets at the end * Format 2 - separated under
>>> learnings (H4s) * Format 3 - definition list presentation with
>>> learning as DT * Format 4 - tabular presentation for learning,
>>> outline and time * Format 5 - tabular presentation and activity
>>> time (time last) * Format 6 - tabular presentation and activity
>>> time (time first) * Format 7 - definition list using timing as DT
>>> See:
>>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/training/2009/scenarios-tf.html
>>>
>>> WAI-AGE TF discussed these recently [1] and decided that the
>>> outlines highlighting the learnings were preferred (formats 2, 3 or
>>> 4 with a preference for format 2).
>>>
>>> Please reply to the lists with any preference you have for the
>>> format of the outlines, or suggested improvements, by 2/March.
>>>
>>> Regards, Andrew [1]
>>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/24-waiage-minutes.html
>>>
>>> -- Andrew Arch Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist
>>> http://www.w3.org/People/Andrew/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Michael Stenitzer | WIENFLUSS information.design.solutions
> www.wienfluss.net | proschkogasse 1/5 | wien06at
> fon ++43 650 9358770 | fax  ++43 1 23680199
>
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 16:06:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:44 UTC