- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:38:06 +0200
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Shawn, all, My comments are on the exchange below and on this version of the page: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/4betaW3org/accessibility-new-w3c> I have several concerns with the following paragraph as it stands now: "The web is a flexible medium that enables most people with impairments to use the web just as well as anyone. Thus, there is inherently no such thing as a disability using the web; the web removes barriers to communication and interaction for most people. However, badly written websites and web tools that are not accessible create barriers that exclude people." #1: "there is inherently no such thing as a disability using the web" - I'm unsure what is exactly meant but this seems to be a blatant over claim in my opinion. I have a disability every day in using the Web, regardless of how accessible it is. There are limitations to what I can or cannot do but an inaccessible site certainly excludes me from being able to use it (or to use it effectively). #2: "the web removes barriers to communication and interaction for most people" - Note that the Web may sometimes also introduce barriers, for example for those who may not have access to it (broader aspects of the digital divide). I think Alan had noted some comments in this direction too. #3: "The web is a flexible medium that enables most people with impairments to use the web just as well as anyone" - Does the word "most" in this sentence contradict the next sentence? #4: "The web is a flexible medium that enables most people with impairments to use the web just as well as anyone" - I'm wondering if there are specific reasons for using the term "impairments" rather than the term "disabilities". #5: "However, badly written websites and web tools that are not accessible create barriers that exclude people" - I prefer this wording over "disable people", I just never felt very comfortable with that word-play. #6: "However, badly written websites and web tools that are not accessible create barriers that exclude people" - Consider reiterating the point about the potential of the Web for people with disabilities, maybe something like "exclude people with disabilities from taking equal part on the Web". #7: spelling of "web" versus "Web" - Had we previously agreed that EO resources will capitalize the word "Web" when it is a noun (like "the [Web|web] is a flexible medium")? Best, Shadi Shawn Henry wrote: > catherine wrote: >> Finally, I reiterate that, for the content at the aforementionned URL, >> second paragraph, last sentence, it is preferable to convey that >> innaccessible ressources exclude people (and not "disable people"). I >> really do feel that it puts a negative spin on the state of disability >> that is unnecessary in this context. > > Hi Catherine, > > Several EOWG participants like the phrase as it is at the end of this > paragraph: > "The web is a flexible medium that enables most people with impairments > to use the web just as well as anyone. Think about what this means: > There is inherently no such thing as a disability using the web. > ...However: When websites and web tools are not accessible, they disable > people from using the web." > > With the addition of "from using the web" does this still bother you? > Can you say more about it to help us understand your perspective? > > (Note that that paragraph is likely to be rewritten -- but it still > helps us to know your perspective so the rewrite can take it into account.) > > Thanks, > ~Shawn > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Saturday, 29 August 2009 05:38:49 UTC