- From: Sylvie duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:01:37 +0200
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Hello Shawn and all, My comments relate to the version from 26 o August at : http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/4betaW3org/accessibility-new-w3c They are separated with dashes. ---------- 1. In "Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at W3C", paragraph "individuals and organizations can: you write by contributing to the WAI interest group" may be it could be helpful to add a link to this group, for people who do not know about it. --------- 2. In paragraph "learn more", the link to "how people with disabilities use the Web" leads to WAI resources. Is it a mistake or is it intentional? As this document is a draft, I understood from previous discussions that it would be better to link to the introduction to how people with disabilities use the Web. <http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/people-use-web> --------- 3. If I am new to Web accessibility and I don't know how to design an accessible Web site, I would be disapointed to read that I need to make some effort to make my site accessible. I would wonder which tool I can use to make an accessible Web site. The document links to ATAG, which someone new to web accessibility who not necessarily read. It would be helpful to have explanations on how to choose the authoring tool, or a sentence saying that there no perfect authoring tool yet, or something about the status of authoring tools and accessibility. -------------- 4. In response to your questions, I cannot find themclearly in the e-mails. I prefer the second proposal : "they disable people from using the web.". Best Sylvie
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 09:58:09 UTC