- From: Heather Hasner <heatherhasner@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:42:48 -0600
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: Liam McGee <liam.mcgee@communis.co.uk>, EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF41DCF600.823D07EF-ON8725760E.00508D0D-8525760E.0050D204@us.ibm.com>
It's a really good write-up, but with the casual tone, it was hard for me to follow along from a business perspective. It all depends on the intent of the write-up and who the target audience is - don't change it if it was not meant for corporate readers. However, it's for corporate readers too, I'm afraid it won't have much substance for me to pull from unless I actually try to read through the entire write-up and pull from the important concepts I picked up on. At first, in the limited time that I have, I will take a quick glance and if appeals to the relevancy of my work, I will read on... Regards, Heather Hasner Global Accessibility Lead for Learning Design & Development, IBM Center for Advanced Learning email: phone: cell: tie line: heatherhasner@us.ibm.com 1-678-248-3663 1-404-643-7424 268-014 Learning Developer Zone Accessibility Center Technical Forum From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> To: Liam McGee <liam.mcgee@communis.co.uk>, Heather Hasner/Atlanta/IBM@IBMUS Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org> Date: 08/10/2009 09:58 AM Subject: Re: Accessibility / SEO overlap Hi Liam, Good info. Thanks for it! I personally like the casual writing style. However, I wonder if people wanting more formal business documents wouldn't take this seriously because of the tone? I'm thinking in particular of Heather's perspective... If we write summaries or highlights for the case studies (as blogs or other), perhaps we want to make those more formal? ~Shawn Liam McGee wrote: > Hi all - have just published > http://www.communis.co.uk/blog/2009-08-06-seo-and-accessibility-overlap > > and I would be very grateful for your comments. > > Kind regards > > Liam >
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: 01-part
Received on Monday, 10 August 2009 14:44:00 UTC