- From: Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:12:51 +0100
- To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Dear EOWG, WAI-AGE slides final draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/Drafts/slides/overview.html In anticipation of discussion on August 31, here are some issues for consideration. # "Older People Online" slide Previous discussion had suggested that the criteria for ordering this list be 'what will influence people selling stuff to older people', however another criteria is the impact on older peoples' participation and at the same time breaking one of the stereotypes that older people are all retired. # "Implications" slide Does the re-worked slide (with the previous "older people online" slide) now bridge the gap between background and findings? # "Observations" slides (2 slides) The current criteria for ordering of these observations is based on the frequency of discussion in the literature, but other criteria could also be used, and again could help dispel some myths. One criteria might be to group like-observation, another might be some assessment of impact. WAI-AGE slide Introduction page: http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/ageing/ This page mirrors the page prepared for "Components of Web Accessibility" recently discussed in EOWG. Regards, Andrew -- Andrew Arch Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist http://www.w3.org/People/Andrew/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 21:13:37 UTC