- From: Henny Swan <hennys@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:19:59 +0000
- To: William Loughborough <wloughborough@gmail.com>
- Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
I have to agree with you here. The whole thing is not meant to be read end-to-end but is designed to be referred to. That in mind I think the Understanding document is excellent. It's the main document I refer to because invariably I'm researching error handling or headings and want everything in one easy page with the rest of the document at hand but out of the way. It also looks a lot prettier and has a better layout than other documents so it gets my vote all round. Great write up Wayne. Henny On 19 Nov 2008, at 08:13, William Loughborough wrote: > It's a bit like saying that the shop manual for an automobile is > "hard reading" or "too long." > > Hence Wayne's "The key misunderstanding here is that someone would > ever need to read either document from end to end." > > This is totally a non-issue disguised as something that matters and > Wayne's description of the process of *using* the documents rather > than actually *reading* them is spot on. > > Love. > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:56 PM, <Anna.Zhuang@nokia.com> wrote: > those 3 docs will remain uneasy reading. > --- Henny Swan Web Evangelist Member of W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Education and Outreach Group www.opera.com Blog: www.iheni.com Stay up to date with the Web Standards Curriculum www.opera.com/wsc
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 09:20:42 UTC