On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:50:48 +0100, Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi> wrote: > Secondly there is value in stating that compliance with the Best > Practices produces accessibility benefits that do not assist with > complicance [because they have been dropped as untestable in WCAG 2.0, > or for any other reason] I agree. WCAG 2.0 compliance, while useful, is not the only or definitive measure of accessibility, any more than compliance to mobile BP is the definitive measure of mobile friendliness. They are just references to a framework document we have available that makes it easier to disucss the goals in concrete terms. We should recognise that, and point out how you can improve user experiences in both areas at the same time. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.comReceived on Wednesday, 20 February 2008 14:58:27 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:42 UTC