Issues with MWBP to WCAG 2.0

Wayne Dick wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was reading MWBP to WCAG 2.0 carefully, and noticed the following 
> issues.  Some appear to be serious
>
> Mobile Web Best Practice to WCAG 2.0
>
>
>
> This probably needs a careful overview:
>
>
>
> Question:
>
> Do we want to list all Level A success criteria in Level AA
>
> Do we want to list all Level A  and level AA success criteria in Level 
> AAA
>
>
>
>
>
> Sort the Noting, Something, Everything lists by WCAG 2.0 Success 
> Criteria number
>
>
>
> Level A...
>
> 1.3.1 is supported by
>
> STRUCTURE, STYLE SHEET SUPPORT, STYLE SHEET USE, TABLE LAYOUT -- as 
> well as FONT
>
> 2.1.1
>
> Does ACCESS_KEY, TAB_ORDER  apply?
>
>
>
> Level AA
>
> On the everything list for Level AA,
>
> the level A
>
> 1.1.1 appears: only something
>
> 1.1.2 , 1.2.5, 1.2.6, 1.2.7 is AAA
>
> 1.3.1 appears : it only requires something
>
> 1.3.2 is level A and TAB_ORDER applies
>
> 2.1.1 is listed as partial before  OBJECT_OR_SCRIPT is sited
>
>
>
> I think all keyboard success criteria need to be reviewed.  The MWBP 
> emphasizes the need for keyboard interface throughout.
>
>
>
> 2.2.1 requires only something --- AUTO_REFRESH
>
>
>
> 2.2.4 is level AAA
>
>
>
>
>
> I need to stop here.
>
>
> I haven't covered Level AAA consideratins
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was reading MWBP to WCAG 2.0 carefully, and noticed the following 
> issues.  Some appear to be serious
>
> Mobile Web Best Practice to WCAG 2.0
>
>
>
> This probably needs a careful overview:
>
>
>
> Question:
>
> Do we want to list all Level A success criteria in Level AA
>
> Do we want to list all Level A  and level AA success criteria in Level 
> AAA
>
>
>
>
>
> Sort the Noting, Something, Everything lists by WCAG 2.0 Success 
> Criteria number
>
>
>
> Level A...
>
> 1.3.1 is supported by
>
> STRUCTURE, STYLE SHEET SUPPORT, STYLE SHEET USE, TABLE LAYOUT -- as 
> well as FONT
>
> 2.1.1
>
> Does ACCESS_KEY, TAB_ORDER  apply?
>
>
>
> Level AA
>
> On the everything list for Level AA,
>
> the level A
>
> 1.1.1 appears: only something
>
> 1.1.2 , 1.2.5, 1.2.6, 1.2.7 is AAA
>
> 1.3.1 appears : it only requires something
>
> 1.3.2 is level A and TAB_ORDER applies
>
> 2.1.1 is listed as partial before  OBJECT_OR_SCRIPT is sited
>
>
>
> I think all keyboard success criteria need to be reviewed.  The MWBP 
> emphasizes the need for keyboard interface throughout.
>
>
>
> 2.2.1 requires only something --- AUTO_REFRESH
>
>
>
> 2.2.4 is level AAA
>
>
>
>
>
> I need to stop here.
>
>
> I haven't covered Level AAA consideratins
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 14:56:07 UTC