- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:15:25 -0700
- To: andrew@w3.org, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
I wonder if it would be worthwhile/possible to tease out the elements in all the studies, etc. that are important for all users from those specific to geezers? It might affect the overwhelming repetition/redundance of suggested solutions that very often aren't peculiarly suited to ageing. Love. ------- Original Message ------- >From : Andrew Arch[mailto:andrew@w3.org] Sent : 4/17/2008 3:06:40 AM To : shadi@w3.org; jbrewer@w3.org; shawn@w3.org; andrew@w3.org; achuter@technosite.es; hbj@visinfo.dk; wed@csulb.edu; sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr; love26@gorge.net; liam.mcgee@communis.co.uk; Lisa.Pappas@sas.com; srush@knowbility.org; saylordj@wellsfargo.com; Henny.Swan@rnib.org.uk; jthorp@gmail.com; jack.r.welsh@boeing.com; yeliz.yesilada@manchester.ac.uk Cc : Subject : RE: EOWG teleconference 18 April 2008 - WAI-AGE materials Dear Active EOWG participants, NOTE: This e-mail was not sent to the public EOWG mailing list. Please do not distribute this information yet, or reply to the EOWG list. As listed in the Agenda for this week [1], we have some further discussion scheduled about WAI-AGE. The document for discussion is the attached word document - an updated draft of the Literature Review that we considered a few weeks ago. Some questions for consideration and discussion, are linked from the agenda. I would refer you in particular to section 3 - A Review of the Literature. If you have any comments or suggestions please prepare for discussion at the EOWG teleconference on Friday, or send them directly to me. Regards, Andrew [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#agenda -- Andrew Arch Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist W3C/ERCIM, Sophia Antipolis, France Ph +33 (0)4 92 38 79 46 www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/
Received on Friday, 18 April 2008 05:16:06 UTC