[regrets] Re: EOWG: Agenda for 23 November 2007 Teleconference

Busy with other work :(


Shawn Henry wrote:
> 
> Dear EOWG Participants:
> 
> An agenda and logistics for our 23 November 2007 teleconference follow.
> Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see: 
>       http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html Bridge:  
> +1.617.761.6200 / +33.4.89.06.34.99 / +44.117.370.6152, code: EOWG# 
> (3694#) IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
> Scribe:  Henny (or Wayne or Andrew) (per 
> www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html)
> Agenda:
> 
> 1. MWBP-WCAG Relationship
> * Requirements/Analysis: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-mwbp-wcag
> * Latest version is linked from the top of the Requirements/Analysis
> An updated version may be sent to the list before the teleconference.
> 
> Some areas for discussion:
> a. The MWBP to WCAG section now incorporates both WCAG 1.0 and 2.0. They 
> are in the same paragraph. Is that easy to understand with the "WCAG 1.0 
> /2.0" text in bold? Should WCAG 2.0 come first?
> b. The WCAG to MWBP section has two parts, first it runs through WCAG 
> 2.0 and how the success criteria relate to MWBPs. Then another section 
> covers WCAG 1.0 and how the checkpoints relate to to the MWBPs. This 
> makes for a lot of redundant wording. Is this organization good because 
> most people will only want to read one section or the other? Other ideas 
> for organization?
> c. The cross references are often hyperlinks. This reduces redundancy 
> and facilitates maintenance, but makes the document at time difficult to 
> work with offline or on paper. To what extent should the document cite 
> the actual text of WCAG (especially the techniques) and the MWBPs?
> d. In the section "How does it help especially users with 
> disabilities?", the text runs "Best Practices that have no specific 
> benefit for users with disabilities beyond that experienced by the 
> general user in the mobile context is marked [no added benefit]" Is that 
> clear? Some people apparently think it means that the MWBPs in question 
> have no benefit for people with disabilities, which is not the 
> intention. Ideas for a better way to say this?
> e. Ideas for the section "3. How Barriers Experienced by Web Users with 
> Disabilities Parallel those in the Mobile Context"?
> 
> 2. Approach to WAI-ARIA Documents
> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-aria-docs
> A document that maps the content for the new documents may be sent to 
> the list before the teleconference.
> 
> 3. WAI-ARIA FAQ
> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/ARIA/faq.html
> An updated version may be sent to the list before the teleconference.
> 
> Regards, ~ Shawn
> ===
> NOTE: If you reply to this email, please change the subject line. If you 
> are sending regrets, add "Regrets" to the front of the current subject 
> line. If you are commenting on a document or topic, put the document 
> title or topic in the subject line. Thanks.
> IRC reminders and tips: - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some 
> participants do not have IRC. All substantive comments should be said 
> verbally in the call (not just in IRC). - To type a side comment that 
> will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type /me comment - e.g.: /me 
> hopes everyone had pleasant holidays will come out: *shawn hopes 
> everyone had pleasant holidays
> Teleconference information: - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html - W3C Zakim Teleconference 
> Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim - Zakim IRC Bot: 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot - A source for help with IRC 
> (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/
> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
> ###
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |

Received on Thursday, 22 November 2007 23:20:52 UTC