- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 09:01:16 -0500
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Dear EOWG Participants: An agenda and calling logistics for our 16 February 2007 teleconference follow. Time: 8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html Bridge: +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#) IRC: Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665 Scribe: See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html Agenda: We will be having some general discussion on several topics during this call: 1. Update and follow-up from EOWG face-to-face and last week's teleconference discussions on "WCAG Basic"/"Web ABC"/"WCAG-on-the-Street". * What follow up thoughts do you have after last week's discussion? One idea is to: a. Provide more support to help WCAG WG simplify/clarify the language in the WCAG 2.0 guidelines and success criteria as much as is feasible, without losing the technical specificity. b. Call the Quick Reference something else, and add to it the information and options described below. c. Provide options (probably with checkboxes) so that people can hide information that is not relevant to them if their Web site doesn't have multimedia, flashing or blinking content, time-outs or timed events, forms for user input, or such. c. Add to it brief notes that are very simple explanations where needed -- that is, where the actual WCAG wording needs to be kept as is, and a little (1-3 sentences) more information is particularly helpful. For example, perhaps explaining "programmatically determined" without making people follow the link to the glossary; and make it so people can turn on or off the Notes with a checkbox. * How would the approach above meet the goals we're already mentioned? * How would this address concerns with previous approaches? Are there any new concerns with this approach? * What would be the strengths and limitations of this approach? * What are your experiences with the WCAG 2.0 Quick Reference? What do you hear about others' experiences with the Quick Reference? - http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/ * What might this new thing be called? 2. EOWG teleconference schedule and upcoming work with WCAG 2.0 Working Draft 3. Trends and Issues * Please send notes to the EOWG mailing list before the call. Regards, ~ Judy & Shawn === IRC reminders and tips: - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC). - to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type /me comment - e.g.: /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays will come out: *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays Teleconference information: - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/ * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings ### -- Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G526 32 Vassar Street Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:02:10 UTC