Accessibility Support should be a Guidline in Part 4 (Robust)

Hi Everyone,

I'm sorry if I'm driving you crazy 
regarding accessibility support. 
 After working on the "Accessibility 
Support" section of "Conformance", I 
realized that accessibility support is 
a basic retirement of web content not 
Web technology.  Web technology is 
invoked by web content, and it can 
create a barrier to access based on 
lack of robustness (interoperability). 
 Accessibility support is the "handle" 
for the new guideline  (say 4.2) and 
the success criteria are the really 
nasty rules for placing a Web 
technology in a list of supported 
technologies.  Actually the list 
should be called the "List of Web 
technologies that can be referenced by 
Level A web content".

I know this suggestion is dense and a 
little radical, but I just spent a 
week thinking about accessibility 
support.  Once I rephrased it, the 
structure began to look much more like 
a guideline than a conformance 
concept.

Put simply: Accessibility support is 
the robustness requirement for the Web 
technologies that are referenced by 
web content.  The "making a list" 
rules are success criteria.

Wayne

Wayne

Wayne Dick PhD
Chair Computer Engineering and 
Computer Science, CSU, Long Beach
Coordinator of Academic Technology 
Accessibility, CSU System

Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 15:28:39 UTC