- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:13:34 -0500
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Comments below, preceded with "SLH:" > [DRAFT EOWG REPLIES TO WCAG WG FOLLOWS] ... > Comment #12: Not accepted, because the revised definition of assistive > technology is more difficult to understand than the original. SLH: I'm not sure there's any need to compare it to the original. We could simplify our comment to: "Not accepted, because the revised definition of assistive technology is still too difficult to understand." > Comment #26: Not accepted. The short handles in the success criteria are > a help, but need them in the guidelines as well. SLH: How about something like this for wording: "Not accepted. The short handles for the success criteria are very useful. We still suggest providing short handles for the guidelines as well." <that's all> ~Shawn
Received on Friday, 1 June 2007 11:14:25 UTC