- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:28:58 -0800
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- CC: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Although singling out individual tools isn't necessarily a good idea, it might make the demonstration evaluation report more "realistic" if the actual tools used were identified and the results of their application to the site be exhibited. The results/advice obtained using said tools might be in the current demonstration report with links to the actual reports furnished by the tools so the user will have fuller exemplification of what it's like to actually apply the tools to a real piece of Webstuff. I think we have sort of glossed over the issue of "clear/simple" by giving it a "yes" in the table, implying that there was somewhat detailed attention paid to whether any attempt at "fog indexes" and such had been applied to the textual content of the site. The other checkpoint getting a "yes" (which implies no necessity for details) is the one dealing with navigation and I don't even know if there is any way to evaluate the "consistency" of the overall navigation scheme. Love.
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 08:29:01 UTC