W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2006

Readings for 10 Feb teleconference: Review Teams draft

From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:18:46 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20060209141557.0403d748@localhost>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Hi all,

Please read the following, in preparation for our teleconference tomorrow, 
and send comments to the list if you have them.

Thanks!

- Judy

Continuing our updating of the Evaluation Resource Suite, please review the 
following materials with regard to Review Teams for Web Accessibility.
         Current (old) version:
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/reviewteams.html
         Proposed requirements, for review, discussion and approval(?)
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-teams.html#about
         Proposed changes for review (changelog may be updated again before 
the meeting)
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-teams.html#changes
*       Revised draft
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/reviewteams-20060209.html
         Questions for discussion of revised draft:
         a) Does the introduction work better organized this way?
         b) How is the tone of the document now?
         c) Does the detail in "Types of Review Teams" work well (or not...)?
         d) Suggestions on how to improve & better balance the "Best 
Practices" section?
         e) Do the subsection headers work better?
         f) Other thoughts on updating alignment w/ the rest of the suite?

###



-- 
Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530
32 Vassar Street
Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 19:19:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:38 UTC