Reading/questions for ATAG 2.0 WD Review

EOWG,

Here are the questions that we will walk through in our discussion of ATAG 
2.0 Working Draft today. Note that we also have the Before/After Demo on 
the agenda, so we will have limited time for this.

Please remember that we have an overview of ATAG, which may be helpful as a 
refresher before reading the current ATAG 2.0 draft.
         http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/atag.php

The call for review that was sent to the WAI IG list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2005OctDec/0187.html
included several questions on which the Authoring Tool Accessibility 
Guidelines Working Group particularly wanted feedback.

Question #2 is pertinent to the review perspective that EOWG takes with WAI 
guidelines:
- Does the updated conformance section, with its concept of "Content 
Type-Specific WCAG Benchmark" seem like a workable mechanism?

In addition, we should consider:
- Is the ATAG 2.0 Working Draft
         http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ATAG20-20051123/
understandable? Please consider the Abstract, Status, Introduction,
         http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ATAG20-20051123/#Introduction
and Conformance Section separately.
         http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ATAG20-20051123/#Conformance

- Are the guidelines and success criteria clear?
         http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ATAG20-20051123/#guidelines

- Are the definitions in the glossary clear and not conflicting with other 
WAI glossaries including EOWG's basic glossary?
         http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ATAG20-20051123/#definitions

Regards,

- Judy



-- 
Judy Brewer    +1.617.258.9741    http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530
32 Vassar Street
Cambridge, MA,  02139,  USA

Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 05:39:02 UTC