Regrets, 19 May 2006 Teleconference

Regrets, sorry,
just because my talk in Neapolitan University [1]

regards,
ciao

~ pasquale


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2006AprJun/0102.html













Il giorno 18/mag/06, alle ore 06:32, Judy Brewer ha scritto:

>
> Dear EOWG Participants:
>
> An agenda and calling logistics for our 19 May 2006 teleconference  
> follow, as well as links for document sections to review.
>
> Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones  
> see:
>           http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
> Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
> IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
>
> Scribe:  Listed at http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
>
> Agenda:
>
> We're continuing our review of the WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft  
> this week, and focusing on the remaining sections. Please post  
> comments to the list in advance if possible -- thanks.
>
> 1. Introduction to WCAG 2.0 [very brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/intro.html
> Focusing on:
> - Does the introduction give a clear picture of what is in WCAG 2.0?
> - Are there any parts that might be confusing for readers?
>
> 2. Comparison between WCAG 1.0 and 2.0 [very brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/appendixD.html
> Focusing on:
> - Helpful? Clear?
> - Does it need any more context up front?
>
> 3. Glossary [brief check]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/appendixA.html
> Focusing on:
> - Are the glossary entries clearer now, and helpful for  
> understanding the text?
> - Are any of the definitions unclear, or significantly conflicting  
> with other versions of WAI definitions for those terms?
>
> 4. Guidelines [not so brief]
> * http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/guidelines.html
> Focusing on:
> - At the guideline level -- any substantial remaining  
> understandability problems?
> - At the success criteria level -- ditto?
> Note:
> - We probably will not have sufficient time to go through all of  
> these,
>    but will select a few to highlight & discuss if needed;
>    people can follow up w/ posting more individual comments as needed.
>
> 5. Comment wrap-up
> - reviewing and approving comments drafted to date
>
> Regards,
>
> ~ Judy & Shawn
>

Received on Thursday, 18 May 2006 20:41:26 UTC