- From: Barry McMullin <mcmullin@eeng.dcu.ie>
- Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 16:13:43 +0100 (IST)
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
On Fri, 5 May 2006, Judy Brewer wrote: > 4. Add a prominent link from the introduction of the baseline section to > the conformance section of WCAG 2.0, and remove redundant info about > conformance from the baseline document itself. (Note that, for now, we are > not recommending the removal of information about baseline from the > conformance section of WCAG 2.0.) I guess the sentence in parentheses above reflects that the EOWG discussion on this is still ongoing - hence the "for now". My own tuppence worth, even at this stage, is to suggest that the conformance section of WCAG 2.0 should best limit itself to normative requirements; and the advisory/informative stuff should be delegated, as far as possible, to the "About baselines" document. This would specifically include most of "Who sets baselines?" (as already suggested by Alan, I think). But as I say, this is ongoing discussion, so I am happy to see all the comments passed on immediately, per Judy's current draft. Best - Barry.
Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 15:15:47 UTC