- From: Wayne Dick <wed@csulb.edu>
- Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 17:36:00 -0700
- To: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>,EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Dear EO, I think the rewrite is much easier to read!. I would suggest changing the section "Why wasn't UAAG used as baselines?" to the following text: <h2> Baselines Make Assumptions About the Capabilities of User Agents </h2> <p> Baselines define the technologies that the user agents of a population must support regardless of disability. The do not require the user agents, including assistive technologies, to change to meet baselines. Instead baselines are chosen to match the expected capabilities of user agents employed by the target user population. </p> <p> In choosing a baseline, an organization may consult the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (currently UAAG 1.0) as follows. To determine whether a technology should be included in a baseline, a content provider may consult the UAAG to determine the kinds of behaviors expected from user agents to support accessible use of that technology. Then the provider organization should determine if the user agents of its target users can be expected to provide this capability. If the available user agents do support accessible use of the technology, regardless of disability, then the content provider organization may include the technology in the baseline. If a population of otherwise qualified disabled users can be expected to employ user agents that do not to support accessible use of the technology then the technology should be left out of the baseline. </p> Wayne Dick PhD Chair Computer Engineering and Computer Science Director WebAdapt2Me Project at CSULB
Received on Sunday, 7 May 2006 00:36:23 UTC