- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 11:38:24 +0200
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>, John M Slatin <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>, Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, Ben Caldwell <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>
Hi, Shawn Henry wrote: > - I don't think we need to add anything about audience to Techniques (or > Application Notes) - I hope what we have there now makes it clear enough > that it's primarily for developers. On a side-note, I actually did get confused by the sub-heading "Application Notes" because it is not in the bulleted list right under the "WCAG 2.0 Working Draft Documents" heading. I propose that bullet (without a link) is added to the list so that the order of the sub-headings matches. Maybe this also needs to become the last sub-section? > Thanks for any quick replies. While I'm at it, a picky one for your discretion: in section "WCAG 2.0 Last Call Status" it says "Because of the nature of the W3C specification development process" which to me sounds a little negative (like we are burdened by this W3C Process). Maybe we want to add a small clarification that this process ensures broad review by the public? Really minor... Otherwise the document looks good, thanks for the work Shawn. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 09:38:35 UTC