- From: Sylvie Duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:01:04 +0200
- To: shawn@w3.org, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Hello Shawn and all, Here are some quick comments on sections 4 and 5 of evaluation report : <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/report> 1. section 4: "evaluation results overview". It is good to list how many checkpoints are met, fail or not applicable. But it could also interest the reader to see how many checkpoints of priority 1, 2, and/or 3 are met, fail or not applicable. Moreover, as the tables listing which checkpoints are met, fail or not applicable are long, a summary listing the checkpoints numbers could be useful. 2. the detailed results are rather difficult to read, in my opinion. Maybe there needs to be a section explaining without details which problems have been found on the site. (but may be this is intended in the "executive summary?". Hte section 5 explains for each topic which checkpoints are relevant, but does not show which are met (what is good.) and which are not met. There could be also some explanations telling the reader why the problem is a barrier for some users. For other comments, the results need to be read in more details and I had no time to do it in depth for now. Best regards Sylvie
Received on Friday, 21 April 2006 11:57:03 UTC