- From: Helle Bjarnø <hbj@visinfo.dk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 13:19:10 +0200
- To: "EOWG" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Cc: <achuter@technosite.es>, <shadi@w3.org>, <liam.mcgee@communis.co.uk>
Have these "wording problems" been discussed in any EO WG call? I've tried to follow the links back to both Liam and Shadi's messages, I've also looked at the "Before" web site. I find it very difficult to get an overview of the impact of the changes without being able to compare the site with the old "offending" wording and the new "neutral" wording. Where can I find the old Before site? I think it will be very difficult not to be able to find one person that will be offended by these rather ridiculous articles on the web site and tend to agree with Liam that we then might as well just put lipsum text in... Cheers Helle Sincerely Helle Bjarnø Visual Impairment Knowledge Centre Rymarksvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark Phone: +45 39 46 01 01 fax: +45 39 61 94 14 e-mail hbj@visinfo.dk Direct phone: +45 39 46 01 04 Mobile: +45 20 43 43 47 www.visinfo.dk www.euroaccessibility.org -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Chuter Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 9:55 AM To: shadi@w3.org Cc: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org; EOWG Subject: Re: tweaked wording I agree with Liam's comments [1] referring to your message [2]. The first change doesn't seem to detract from the humour too much. But the changes do seem to be going beyond what is reasonable in catering to all possible sensitivities. I don't think that the content actually satirises anyone. I would vote to leave it as is. best regards, -- Alan Chuter Accessibility Consultant, Technosite (formerly Fundosa Teleservicios), Madrid, Spain. achuter@technosite.es [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-eo-badtf/2006Mar/0016.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-eo-badtf/2006Mar/0015.html
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 11:17:14 UTC