- From: Barry McMullin <mcmullin@eeng.dcu.ie>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:03:54 +0000 (GMT)
- cc: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > > 4. We list the entry with "Vendor Name" - implies the tools are 'for sale'. > > Many tools are free, so it would be better to list this as "Developer". But > > probably not a problem as this is just place-holding text? > > Maybe a point of discussion: just the word "developer" is often > ambiguous and can mistaken for Web developer as opposed to tool > developer. Instead of every time saying "tool developer, > vendor, or owner" I tried just "vendor" as an umbrella > term. Maybe we should be more explicit in the disclaimer? Maybe > there is a better umbrella term? Suggestions welcome. The possible confusion with "web developer" had not occurred me, at least <shrug>. How about "provider"? Just my 2 cent worth... - Barry.
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 08:08:07 UTC