Re: EOWG: Agenda for 7 October 2005 Teleconference

Hi Judy, hi Shadi, hi all.

I think that "sort" option and "search" option on the same sentence is not the best 
way to represent items and help user findings tools.
We should distinguish "sort" option from "search" option.

We could write something like:

<h3>Customize List</h3>
Sort evaluation tools according to:  [option menu]
and/or search tools matching featuring criteria
[here go the checkboxes of the filters.php page]

In this way, if user want a complete sorted list of tools can use the option menu; if 
he want a refined search, can use the checkboxes.

The two opportunities should remain distinct:
sort - arrangement of data in a prescribed sequence, and
search - to find something


About second question, I think that we could split release date and vendor name 
from tool name.
So we could have something like:

AccessEnable
Vendor: RetroAccess
Release Date: 22 September 2005
Description: AccessEnable? is an online website evaluation and correction product 
line that is able to make site-wide automatic fixes as well as interactive fixes to 
satisfy Federal and other web accessibility standards. Developed by RetroAccess.
Functions: Automated Checking, Repair
Guidelines: WCAG 1.0
Web Formats: CSS, HTML


Regards
ciao

pasquale





Il giorno 06/ott/05, alle ore 22:44, Judy Brewer ha scritto:
2. Sortable List of Evaluation Tools
   A revised draft, incorporating previous EOWG comments, is available:
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools/list/test.php
   Note: database is incomplete, and not up-to-date
   Questions:
   - are the searching capabilities intuitive?
   - is the display of the results clear and simple?

 




________________________________________________________________
Sent via the WebMail system at osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com

Received on Friday, 7 October 2005 09:19:07 UTC