W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2005

EOWG: Agenda and Readings for teleconference 30 September 2005

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:46:30 -0500
Message-ID: <433B6396.1070404@w3.org>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>


Readings, an agenda, and calling logistics for our 30 September 2005 teleconference follow.

Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern time; for other time zones see:
Bridge:   +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:      channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665

SCRIBE:   Andrew, per: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
READINGS: Involving Users documents listed under #2 below

1. Outreach updates (brief)
- please send to EOWG mailing list in advance, note any trends or issues for EOWG discussion

2. Involving Users in Web Accessibility Evaluation
* [DRAFT] Involving Users in Web Accessibility Evaluation
* Requirements and Changelog for "Involving Users in Web Accessibility Evaluation"
* previous drafts:

Review & Discussion Questions:

2.1. How does this draft address the issues raised in previous discussions & in comments?
See references: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut#refs
and changes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut#changes

2.2. Are there any new issues with this draft?
See especially the [notes for reviewers] under: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut#2005-09-28

2.3. Imagine different audiences, e.g.:
- Web developer in small design firm whose knowledge is mostly technical, not accessibility or usability testing
- Web accessibility tester who only knows how to use evaluation tools and a little manual checking, has never involved users
- manager who has been asked to provide money for her staff to involve users with disabilities in accessibility evaluation
- usability professional who knows nothing about accessibility
- and others listed at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/redesign/users.html#list
How does this document work for different audiences?

2.4. Other than any remaining open issues [marked with @@] and the terminology section at the end, is this draft ready for sign off to publish it as Version 1?

~ Shawn & Judy


IRC reminders and tips:
* IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
* to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type /me comment - e.g.:
	/me hopes Andrew had a good biking trip
- will come out:     
	*shawn hopes Andrew had a good biking trip

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/

* Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings

Received on Thursday, 29 September 2005 03:46:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:38 UTC