W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: EOWG: Agenda and Readings for teleconference 9 September 2005 - and regrets

From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 23:08:39 +0200
Message-Id: <46FD7B12-0C89-4EFE-9864-6A0AB21379E6@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi Shawn,
hi all.
Here's some my thoughts.

And please, accept my regrets for tomorrow.



> 2. Reorganization of the Evaluation Resource Suite
> Review questions:
> 2.a. Do these pages sufficiently stand alone?
> - Evaluating Web Accessibility http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/ 
> Overview.html
> - Preliminary Review... http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/ 
> preliminary.html
> - Conformance Evaluation... http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/ 
> conformance.html
> - Special Considerations... http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/ 
> considerations.html

Yes, I think they work.

> 2.b. In one discussion, we suggested adding to the overview page a  
> small business case like paragraph about the benefits of evaluating  
> for accessibility. Is it OK to put that on the list for the next  
> revision (later in 2005 or in 2006), rather than adding it now?

It's ok for the next revision.

> 2.c. Are there any serious concerns with the content that we need  
> to address now? (Keep in mind that we plan to do a major rewrite of  
> the documents in 2006.)

No, we can do it in 2006.

> 2.d. Are these pages ready to be put on the new site?

Yes, it's a good idea.

> 3. Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools
> * latest draft: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/ 
> selectingtools.html
> * changelog: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/selectingtools- 
> changelog.html
> This is a new document (that is, the content has not yet been  
> posted to main site). See the requirements at:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/selectingtools- 
> changelog.html#about
> Review questions:
> 3.a. Does this page fit cleanly with the other pages in the  
> resource suite?


> 3.b. Are there any issues with the content that we need to address  
> for this first version?

No, I think it's very good.

> 3.c. Is this page ready to be put on the new site?


> 4. (if time) Priorities for Translating WAI Documents
> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/translation.html#priorities
> For discussion:
> Where do the newly-completed items fit in the lists?
> - Introduction to Web Accessibility (temporarily at the top of the  
> "Top priority:" list)
> - Essential Components of Web Accessibility  (temporarily near the  
> top of the "Top priority:" list)
> - Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your  
> Organization (temporarily near the bottom of the "Introductory and  
> short materials:" list)

Near the top of the "Top priority": list.

Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 21:08:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:38 UTC