Re: EOWG: Readings and Agenda for teleconference 2 September 2005

Regrets.


Shawn Henry wrote:
> 
> EOWG:
> 
> Calling logistics and an agenda for our 2 September 2005 teleconference 
> follow.
> 
> Time:     8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern time; for other time zones see:
>          http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
> Bridge:   +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
> IRC:      channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
> 
> SCRIBE:      Wayne, per: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
> 
> READINGS to prepare for teleconference described in e-mail "EOWG: Review 
> this week: Evaluating with Users":
>    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2005JulSep/0118.html
> 
> 1. Outreach updates (brief)
> - please send to EOWG mailing list in advance, note any trends or issues 
> for EOWG discussion
> 
> 2. Evaluating Web Accessibility with Users
> * Requirements and Changelog for "Evaluating Web Accessibility with Users"
>    http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-eval-ut
> * [EARLY CONCEPT DRAFT] Evaluating Web Accessibility with Users:
>    http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/users.html
> 
> Review Notes:
> * it is an "early concept draft" - meaning it is just a rough outline, 
> unformatted, with incomplete sentences, etc. * to get a quick overview, 
> you can skim the words in bold (<strong> in HTML)
> * stuff in curly brackets are quotes from another resource to give an 
> idea of what we might say
> * the content of each point is not representative of the amount we would 
> be covering it - some points that would have a couple sentences have no 
> notes yet, and others where we would only have one sentence already have 
> more information than we would use
> 
> Review & Discussion Questions:
> 2.1. Overall reaction?
> 2.2. Does this include the points we want to cover? Is anything missing?
> 2.3. Are there things we can cut out of this (in order to make the 
> document shorter)?
> 2.4. Are we meeting the needs of the identified audiences? (within 
> reason, wanting to keep it short!) (Primary audience: Web developers 
> (designers, content authors, etc.) who want to comply with Web 
> accessibility standards; Secondary audiences: decision makers, 
> professional evaluators, and accessibility researchers; Also: usability 
> professionals)
> 2.5. What things need to be explained or defined? That is, what do we 
> think most readers won't know and can't figure out easily?
> 2.6. How does this organization work? Other thoughts for organization?
> 2.7. How does the title work? How is it for translatability? Other 
> thoughts for title?
> 
> Regards,
> ~ Shawn & Judy
> 
> ===
> 
> IRC reminders and tips:
> * IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. 
> All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just 
> in IRC).
> * to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, 
> type /me comment - e.g.:
> /me hopes Andrew had a good biking trip
> - will come out:     *shawn hopes Andrew had a good biking trip
> 
> Teleconference information:
> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/
> - Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
> 
> ###
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra,     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
Chair and Team Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),           http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
WAI-TIES Project,                 http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,     http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles -- 06560, Sophia-Antipolis -- France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64           Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22

Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2005 18:34:37 UTC