- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:26:08 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <007d01c51ea5$4ab043f0$a201a8c0@deque.local>
I disagree with this approach. There is a need to state direct benefit of eval process and not attribute benefits of Web accessibility to eval process.
The eval process is a quality assurance process.
The eval process can give greater credibility to conformance claims made by content creators as it typically involves both eval tools and human testers. Testing by independent and knowledgeable individuals can also be relied upon by a court.
Sailesh Panchang
Senior Accessibility Engineer
Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive,
4th Floor, Reston VA 20191
Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105
E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com
Fax: 703-225-0387
* Look up <http://www.deque.com> *
----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck Letourneau
To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:27 PM
Subject: Benefits of Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility
For "[Draft] Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility"
[http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/]
I volunteered to draft a short paragraph under the heading:
2. Benefits of Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility
Here is my first attempt, for discussion:
Evaluating a Web site for accessibility gives a practical path to reaping
all the benefits - technical, legal, social and economic - that are
described in detail in
"Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization"
[http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/]. An evaluation may highlight
accessibility problems with a site and learning how and why to fix those
problems (and then fixing them) will deliver those benefits.
Regards,
Chuck Letourneau
Starling Access Services
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2005 21:30:59 UTC