- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:26:08 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <007d01c51ea5$4ab043f0$a201a8c0@deque.local>
I disagree with this approach. There is a need to state direct benefit of eval process and not attribute benefits of Web accessibility to eval process. The eval process is a quality assurance process. The eval process can give greater credibility to conformance claims made by content creators as it typically involves both eval tools and human testers. Testing by independent and knowledgeable individuals can also be relied upon by a court. Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Fax: 703-225-0387 * Look up <http://www.deque.com> * ----- Original Message ----- From: Chuck Letourneau To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 3:27 PM Subject: Benefits of Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility For "[Draft] Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility" [http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/eval/] I volunteered to draft a short paragraph under the heading: 2. Benefits of Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility Here is my first attempt, for discussion: Evaluating a Web site for accessibility gives a practical path to reaping all the benefits - technical, legal, social and economic - that are described in detail in "Developing a Web Accessibility Business Case for Your Organization" [http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/]. An evaluation may highlight accessibility problems with a site and learning how and why to fix those problems (and then fixing them) will deliver those benefits. Regards, Chuck Letourneau Starling Access Services
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2005 21:30:59 UTC