- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:20:47 -0500
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
EOWG,
Following is a *Rough & Incomplete Draft* of our comments on the ATAG 2.0
Last Call Working Draft from last week. Remember that the comments are due
to AUWG by next Tuesday, 18 January, so we need to finish our discussion on
this in the EOWG teleconference today, 14 January.
Please consider these among any additional comments that you may be raising
following your review of ATAG 2.0 this week.
These are all DRAFT comments on the document at:
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ATAG20-20041122/>http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-ATAG20-20041122/
for which the Call for Review is available at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2004OctDec/0221.html
1. Build more plain-language clarification into the first few paragraphs of
the Introduction, so that readers have more of an idea what ATAG is within
the first few sentences of the Introduction. Right now the first sentence
seems fairly abstract and does not give a clear idea of what the document is.
2. Check for understandability of the writing throughout the whole
Introduction section, particularly focusing on the sequence of what is
stated, and where it's explained. Right now these do not seem to flow clearly.
3. This ATAG document doesn't seem to sufficiently differentiate itself
from WCAG, even though there is a section addressing this.
4. The status section is very long. There is some redundant information,
and some information that seems more appropriate for an Introduction than
for a Status section.
That is as far as we got with our discussion last week.
- Judy
--
Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI
Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530
32 Vassar Street
Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 14 January 2005 05:20:32 UTC