W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2004

RE: [components] updated, please comment Tuesday 28 Sept 2004

From: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:07:00 +1000
To: "'Shawn Lawton Henry'" <shawn@w3.org>
Cc: "'EOWG \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006201c4a4ff$d79a0eb0$7dc8a8c0@yourdh7axfhyur>

I know "That's how it is on the site" - doesn't mean it is 100% correct or
best practice ;-) (The WSTF project will allow us to improve many things :-)

I just don't want to mislead people about logos that are also key links! So,
maybe a more generic example would be better - say, the photo of Tim
[alt="photo of Sir Tim Berners-Lee"]?


BTW, the WAI logo on <http://www.w3.org/WAI/> should not be linked.

-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Lawton Henry [mailto:shawn@w3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, 28 September 2004 11:25 AM
To: 'Andrew Arch'
Cc: 'EOWG (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: [components] updated, please comment Tuesday 28 Sept 2004

> Then, the alt text is OK, but
> would be better as "Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) logo -
> WAI home page". [Alternatively, a link title could be added.]

That's how it is on the site, with title:
<a title="WAI Home" href="/WAI/">
<img align="left" alt="Web Accessibility Initiative logo" border="0"

Since we want to keep this example as simple as possible, and the
example does not have context saying it is a link to another page, I
vote we leave as is. OK? Alternatively, we use a generic image & alt
example so as to avoid confusion with the logo at the top of the page...

~ Shawn
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 02:07:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:52 UTC