- From: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:30:07 -0400
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
DRAFT: EOWG Comments on Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 30 July 2004 Working Draft NOTE: This is a DRAFT document and should not be referenced. The Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG) [will] offer[s] the following comments on the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 30 July 2004 Working Draft [1]. These DRAFT comments derive from discussions held at EOWG teleconferences (only so far) on 27 August 2004. 1. It is difficult to follow the transition directly from the guidelines to the success criteria. It would be helpful to have an explanation of the guideline available immediately following the text of the guideline, especially for people new to Web accessibility. Or alternatively each guideline should include a brief introduction to the guideline. Perhaps these explanations could be handled by having different views of the guidelines available. 2. Be careful about the use of jargon. Either introduce the terms when first used, or provide a clear link to an explanation in the glossary. Terms which may need introduction but for which it appeared no explanation was available, or was not available where it would have been most helpful, include: user agent, success criteria, full range of disabilities, multimedia, operable, spatial pattern threshhold. With regard to "spatial pattern threshhold," it would be helpful to separate out the definition, perhaps by a box, from the individual success criteria. 3. Better clarify the use of informative and normative within the format of the current guidelines. 4. Change or clarify the invisible/visible distinction. If the WCAG Working Group does not keep this as part of the format, it would be good to retain the information somehow, such as by integrating it into the text. 5. Nest the sequence of items in the top layer overview to better match the structure of the document. 6. Better indicate and explain the navigation between the documents. EOWG looks forward to the changes that WCAG WG is working on in this area. 7. Rename the section entitled "how to read this document" to "How to read this set of documents." 8. Add more cross-links to facilitate jumping back and forth within the document when following references to other parts of the document. 9. Present the blue boxes differently but keep something for differentiation. 10. Use the term levels rather than A, AA, AAA. -- Judy Brewer +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/CSAIL Building 32-G530 32 Vassar Street Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Friday, 3 September 2004 12:30:01 UTC