- From: Sylvie Duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:09:23 +0200
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hello Judy and all, After a careful re-reading of the document, my vote is: > 2. Okay, but recommend the following changes 1. In the "overview" section, at the end of the third paragraph, the following sentence is too long and needs several times reading for me to be understood. Is it possible to make it shorter and easier to understand? "Widespread availability of improved authoring tools can enable accessible design to become the prevailing design mode even for Web developers initially unaware of the need for accessibility or disinclined to learn guidelines and techniques for achieving accessibility." 2. In the section "Web developers", I have a problem with following sentence in the second paragraph: "For instance, inconsistent initial support in browsers for Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) features such as CSS positioning led many Web developers to rely on less accessible design solutions for layout for many years." Proposed rewording: For instance, for many years inconsistent initial support in browsers for Cascading Style Sheet (CSS) features, such as CSS positioning, led many Web developers to rely on less accessible design solutions for layout. 3. In information repositories, first paragraph, I have difficulties unerstanding the following setence because of its length: "If the content in an information repository conforms to a consistent accessibility standard, then that content can be shared among an unlimited number of users, and re-purposed and personalized according to user profiles which may include information on prefered learning styles and the accessibility requirements of users with disabilities." Regards Sylvie
Received on Tuesday, 18 May 2004 08:09:26 UTC