- From: Chuck Letourneau <cpl@starlingweb.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 07:56:16 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040423075216.02239078@host.igs.net>
OK... now I understand what Henk is proposing (I read some background material that is scattered around the site). At this point, I would have to second the concerns Andrew mentioned in his e-mail of this morning (last evening?). Regards, Chuck Letourneau Starling Access Services At 2004-04-23 07:42, Chuck Letourneau wrote: >I don't understand what Henk is proposing. The draft WAI-Glossary >[http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/Glossary/printable.html] already contains [all] >the terms included in the list he provided. Is the suggestion to extract >that subset of terms into a separate reference document? I admit I have >not been a party to any of the discussions about the Glossary so perhaps I >am missing some context. > >Regards, >Chuck Letourneau >Starling Access Services > >At 2004-04-16 07:49, Henk Snetselaar wrote: > > >>Dear all, >> >>WAI-EO is planning to have a 'WAI-Glossary' to explain words used in >>WAI documents that might be difficult to understand by readers of >>several countries and backgrounds. >> >>The list below is a first proposal of the entries from the W3C-glossay >>that WAI-EO could take in consideration for such a 'WAI-glossary', done >>by Braillenet and Accessibility. >> >>Comments are welcome. >> >>Regards, >>Henk
Received on Friday, 23 April 2004 07:56:52 UTC