- From: Chuck Letourneau <cpl@starlingweb.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:29:41 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Some suggestions/considerations for the business case suite: Economic factors page: [http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/econ.html] 1) Economic benefits, para 2: "In order to assess audience growth ..." [We discussed this point on the conference call.] I think this is important information, but inappropriately located. It breaks the flow of good news. Maybe we need a section (or accompanying page) that provides "considerations for measuring benefits" or "how the hell can you prove these outrageous claims of benefit?" Actually those two paragraphs - (public relations, etc.) should not be at the forefront of this section in any case. 2) Audience Expansion: I would move the third grouping ("Improving the access...") to the top of the section - following the header. That explains the thesis, while the other two sections support it. [We also discussed this point on the conference call.] Technical Factors page: [http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/tech.html] 3) Reduce Site Maintenance - Use W3C technologies : Originally we also intended to imply that (most) W3C technologies were routinely vetted for accessibility concerns (by PFWG for example), while we could not make a similar claim for non-W3C "standards". This may be less true now (of non-W3C standards). I don't know if it would be useful (or politic) to restate this claim in some manner Chuck Letourneauf Starling Access Services "Access A World Of Possibility"
Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 13:30:18 UTC