At 11:14 PM 5/1/2003 -0400, Judy Brewer wrote: >For discussion at our 2 May 2003 meeting Somehow this email was dated 1 May about a 2 May meeting and I got it on 3 May! Really felt weird! The "questions" section really sticks out now and I hope that's what was intended because it's what I've been dreaming of for us/it. I think this bulleting/highlighting (I hope that in the previous meeting the talk on "over-bulletizing" wasn't intended to avoid this sort of emphasis) would be of benefit within a great many of our documents, which often appear a bit too much like doctoral dissertations rather than WEB documents. I guess I hold rather strongly with Jakob Nielsen's urgings as expressed in http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9710a.html in which he answers his question "how do people read on the Web?" with "They don't". -- Love. It's Bad Luck to be Superstitious!Received on Sunday, 4 May 2003 13:08:17 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:34 UTC